For a frighftul few moments, YouTube was partially down, with an outage impacting the major video platform’s home page. According to an official statement, an issue with the platform’s recommendation system was the cause.
During the outage, trying to load the YouTube home page on a desktop brought up a blank page. The sidebar menu appeared as normal, but the home feed, normally filled with algorithmically recommended videos, showed nothing.
YouTube videos accessed via the subscriber bar or search still worked, despite the home page issues. For example, searching for Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show brought up the video, which was then viewable in full.
Thanks for the report. We can confirm that we're aware of the issue & our team is currently working on a fix. We appreciate your patience while we get this sorted
“Thanks for the report,” the post said. “We can confirm that we’re aware of the issue & our team is currently working on a fix. We appreciate your patience while we get this sorted.”
YouTube being partially down also affected the mobile app. Like the desktop view, the home page showed either a blank screen or an error message. When trying to access the subscriptions tab, it took a couple of refreshes before it would display any content.
Screenshot: Chris Button.
It’s not currently clear what caused the issue. At the time of publication, YouTube’s home page started working again across both desktop and mobile.
“An issue with our recommendations system prevented videos from appearing across surfaces on YouTube (including the homepage, the YouTube app, YouTube Music and YouTube Kids). The homepage is back, but we’re still working on a full fix – more coming soon!”
So, while the home page is up and running again, it appears there are still some under-the-surface tweaks to be made.
All I want is a house and clothes that are always clean and tidy, food that is exactly what I want when I want it. However, I don’t actually want to clean, launder or cook, and I don’t have the money for a Downton Abbey-style household staff. Robot vacuum cleaners and mops are supposed to be part of the answer for this.
While I was generally pretty happy with the performance of the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S, it’s not quite at the level where my mopping and vacuuming days are over.
The Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S is a sleek and premium-looking unit. It was easy to set up (though it took a little longer than I had anticipated), the app is intuitive, and the mapping process was quick and painless. It didn’t correctly identify any of my room types, but I appreciated that it tried its best.
Image: Alice Clarke.
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S specifications and price
Robot Vacuum Dimensions
350 x 350 x 97.5mm (retracted LDS)
350 x 350 x 119mm (lifted LDS)
There’s a lot to love in those specs. For starters, that’s a decent battery capacity, and a good level of suction power, plus I’m impressed by Dreame’s confidence in having a three-year manufacturer’s warranty. That shows that the company has faith in the product.
What surprises me about these specs is the design of the stair-climbing feature. I haven’t seen many steps that are 4cm tall with a couple of centimetres before another 2cm rise. Maybe that’s popular in other countries? Because it just seems like a tripping hazard. Perhaps it’s for homes that have a little rise between the living room and the entrance way, followed almost immediately by a very thick rug?
But again, that sounds like a fun way to constantly trip over. It just seems oddly specific and extremely niche obstacle to design a feature around clearing. However, that 4.2cm clearance is going to be great for all those homes with very thick rugs, little rises between rooms, or just unusual layouts.
Regardless of how the device looks on paper, the most important thing is how it actually performs at home. On that front, I am somewhat less impressed.
Mopping
The jury is still out on whether track-style robot mops and roller-style robot mops are better.
For those who aren’t familiar, track-style mops look like a square version of the roller mop, and the roller mop — as seen in the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow — looks like the roller bar in any cordless vacuum cleaner.
Both sides have made good points. The only thing we can agree on is that the vibrating plates and spinning cloth mop feet are The Worst.
Personally, I think track-style mops have a lot of potential. This is because they can exert more downwards force, there’s more surface area to touch the floor, and they seem easier to scrape clean. However, after my experience with the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S, I perhaps might have to rethink my stance.
It’s easy to access the Dreame’s clean and dirty water tanks in the docking station. Image: Alice Clarke.
I have a toddler, so my apartment constantly looks like it’s recently been robbed by people who also paused to have a food fight mid-ransacking. No matter how many times I mop my kitchen floor each week, it will still have little lumps of dried pasta sauce, broccoli and yogurt. I’ve set the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S to clean most days, and while the apartment is noticeably less dusty, I still have to get out my wet-dry floor cleaner more often than I’d like to clean up after the robot finishes.
Navigation limitations
Part of the problem is the navigation. As part of my testing, I got the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S to clean my kitchen three times in a row on the deep cleaning setting. While it was able to pick up some of the loose debris, the things on the floor that needed to be mopped came out of the experience unscathed, when the whole point of the exercise was for them to become very scathed.
Good edge cleaning is touted as a feature of premium robot vacuums. Image: Alice Clarke.
Part of the problem was that, for some baffling reason, the robot wouldn’t go up to the edges of the room. It is designed to be able to do great edge cleaning, and I watched the mop track come out of the body of the machine to get to the edges, but the wheels directed it to be at least a couple of centimetres away from the dishwasher and the cabinets every time, so the little brush would push the debris into the edges of the room, never to be sucked up, and easy spills were missed.
As you can see, the edges were largely ignored. Image: Alice Clarke.
While it was able to pick up wet yogurt reasonably well, with only some residue left behind, anything vaguely dried was left as is. Its pick-up power was weak.
After this $2,999 robot finished deep cleaning my kitchen for the third time, I got out my stick vacuum cleaner and steam mop and finished the job.
Vacuuming
Aside from the part where the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S is bad at edge cleaning, I was really impressed by how much flour and oats the robot was able to pick up from carpets and tiles.
What impressed me more, though, and why I’m not completely writing off the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S despite poor mopping performance, is how good it was at cleaning the foam play mat in my daughter’s room. This play mat is so tall that most robots just tremble in fright and go around it. The Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S used its ProLeap obstacle-clearing powers to climb up, get almost all the plaster dust that got in the foam after I put up her wind chimes, and then continued on with the job with no complaints.
Aside from edges, the Aqua10 vacuums floors well. Image: Alice Clarke.
I’m also impressed that I’ve barely ever had to rescue it from eating socks or cables. Not never, there’s been a couple of cases of it choking on a tiny sock, a Duplo cape and a charging cable. But most of the time it manages to avoid these objects, and for that I am grateful.
I do wish it were better at navigation, though. It’s gotten lost under the dining table a few times. Plus, there have been multiple occasions where it’s lowered its LDS navigation head to go under the sideboard and then gotten stuck because it can’t see a way out, despite being open on three sides. It doesn’t get stuck every time, and I haven’t found a pattern for why it gets stuck sometimes and not others.
Dock performance
When it comes to emptying, cleaning and other general dock things, I really love this dock. It’s all laid out in a way that makes sense, it looks sleek and attractive, and if it weren’t for all the problems, I would absolutely love it.
Sadly, the problem is gravity. Gravity is the enemy on two fronts here.
The first is the power cable. It seems to gradually wiggle its way out of the dock until the robot no longer charges consistently. I think because of the vibrations caused by the mop washing cycle? But I have had to push that plug in multiple times over the months I’ve been using it.
Image: Alice Clarke.
The second is that the robot sometimes doesn’t charge for no apparent reason, even when the power cable is plugged in. It parks itself back in the dock, recognises it’s there, and then doesn’t charge. It’s usually when the robot ends up at a very slight angle, or I think sometimes it slides back out of the dock just enough that it loses contact with the charging point.
This has meant that I’ve had to interact with the dock and think about how the robot charges more often than I have with almost any other robot I’ve tried in the last five years. It’s just annoying.
Who is the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S for?
The Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S is a solid robot vacuum cleaner; it’s great at vacuuming, as long as you don’t need it to get into the corners of your home. Fantastic suction.
But, because of my annoyances with the dock and the lacklustre mop, I hesitate to recommend it to people who aren’t willing to be a bit more hands-on with their robot. It’s not a bad machine, I’m just not sure it’s a particularly good one for $3,000. If it were a cheaper robot, I would be more forgiving of its foibles.
But with the features on paper, and the recommended retail price being at the absolute top of the range, I would expect to have the best experience available, and this just doesn’t provide that.
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S
The Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Track S is a solid robot vacuum cleaner. It’s great at vacuuming, as long as you don’t need it getting into the corners of your home, and you don’t particularly care about mopping.
Features
8
Value for money
5
Performance
6
Ease of use
8
Design
6
Positives
Good suction
Auto-empty station’s water tanks are easy to deal with
App is easy to use
Negatives
Isn’t good at mopping
Doesn’t get into corners and edges
Some niggling annoyances with the dock in terms of charging
As much as I like my Rode Wireless Go microphone, there’s a bit of friction involved when I want to use it with my phone. Now, I’ve got a pretty good incentive to upgrade, with the Gen 3 Rode Wireless Go now supporting direct Bluetooth connectivity with iPhones.
Via a firmware update, both the Gen 3 Go and the Wireless Pro models can now take advantage of Rode’s “Direct Connect” technology. First introduced with the petite Rode Wireless Micro range, Direct Connect enables Bluetooth connectivity between the transmitters and an iPhone when using the Rode Capture app.
So, instead of fumbling around for a USB-C cable or plugging in an additional dongle, the Gen 3 Wireless Go and Wireless Pro connect completely wirelessly. I’ve got the older Gen 2 model, so I just miss out on the added feature, but I’m confident it would make recording on the go a lot smoother.
It’s also encouraging to see Direct Connect come to Rode’s other wireless microphones. As nifty as the Micro is, it doesn’t have the internal storage or 32-bit float recording of the Wireless Go or Wireless Pro. 32-bit float recording, in particular, is a big one: it saves a backup audio file that can be a lifesaver if the original recording is lost or you get any distortion from peaking.
Which iPhones does Direct Connect work with?
According to Rode, as long as an iPhone runs iOS 14 or above, that’s enough to work with Direct Connect. However, the Rode Capture app listing mentions iOS 16 and the iPhone XS as the minimum requirements. With that in mind, any iPhone from the last few years will work with the newly enabled Bluetooth connectivity.
As for Android users, Rode says it’s “actively working on Android support for Rode Capture”. While the company didn’t commit to an exact timeline, it plans to bring Direct Connect to more devices in the future.
Rode adding Direct Connect via a firmware update also means there’s no need to buy additional equipment. That’s a refreshing change in the consumer tech industry, where every inch of value is squeezed out of customers.
Apple is expected to debut its new lower-priced MacBooks at a recently confirmed “special experience” in early March.
Various in-person events are being held across New York, London, and Shanghai on 4 March, US time, a departure from Apple’s traditional keynote approach. As previously reported by Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman, Apple plans to launch a new range of cheaper MacBooks in March, which lines up with the event’s timing.
Gurman also noted that the colours included on Apple’s graphic for the event align with some of the speculated designs for the new MacBooks. Made from aluminium, the entry-level laptops are said to come in various bright colours, including yellow, green, and blue.
Previous reports suggested a sub-US$1,000 price for the MacBooks, but there’s no clarity beyond that at this stage. Overseas, the cheapest MacBook Air retails for US$999. Locally, the MacBook Air starts at $1,699. Based on Apple’s reported affordability approach, the new laptop will be cheap enough to differentiate itself from the Air.
Apple’s cost savings reportedly stem from cheaper internals. Instead of using its M-series system-on-a-chip found throughout recent Macs and iPads, the unannounced laptop will use an iPhone processor. It’s also expected to include a smaller sub-13-inch display, more compact than any other MacBook.
Cornering the student and lower-budget market could be Apple’s way of boosting its computer sales, which form a small part of its overall business. According to the company’s 2025 fiscal year report, Macs made up approximately eight per cent of its revenue, compared to 50 per cent from iPhones.
AI’s huge demand for memory is having ongoing major flow-on effects throughout the consumer tech industry. One of the latest potential victims of the current memory shortage is Sony, which is reportedly looking at delaying the next PlayStation (widely speculated to be the PS6) until 2029.
As investment in AI datacentres continues to grow, so does the requirement for DRAM, placing pressure on other devices that also need memory. As a result, phones, PCs, and gaming consoles are among the gadgets expected to cost more in 2026 or face delays as memory supplies dwindle.
Nintendo is also considering raising the price of the Switch 2 console, which launched in June last year. The current situation brings back memories of the global semiconductor shortage during the COVID-19 pandemic, which made common gadgets hard to come by.
This may come as a surprise to some, but podcasts used to be an audio format first and foremost. But in recent years, video has threatened to kill the podcast star, as the formerly audio-specific medium transitioned to social media and video-based platforms. Apple, seen as one of the pioneers of podcasts, is now bringing video to its podcasting app.
When Apple’s updated Podcasts app drops as part of the upcoming iOS 26.4 update, you’ll be able to choose between listening to and watching podcast episodes that have a video component. Since iOS 17.4, Apple has supported in-app podcast transcriptions, so you can also read shows if you wish.
For podcasters, the video update will support dynamic ad inserts, in addition to an impressions-based payout for shows that rack up views. Apple recommends that creators use the HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) video format, which podcasters upload to a supported hosting service that can then be connected to Apple Podcasts feeds.
It signals a big change for Apple, which started its podcasting journey 20 years ago. Audio is still king, however, according to data from Deloitte’s Media & Consumer Insights 2025 report. Australians average two hours and 40 minutes of weekly podcast listening time, compared to 35 minutes of “vodcast” consumption.
For those keen to try out video podcasts through Apple, it’s available to test as part of the iOS 26.4, iPadOS 26.4, and visionOS 26.4 developer betas. Everyone else can check it out when the functionality launches in full this autumn.
Not every robot vacuum is suited to every type of home. Some specialise in different types of cleaning, or perform better in one layout but not another. Roborock’s Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is a good example: it’s a capable automatic cleaner, albeit better at maintaining hard floors than dense carpets.
As a cat owner, random tufts of fluff and fur are a daily part of my life. My efforts to keep a pristine floor keep coming undone by the (adorable) menace of a silver tabby we call a family member. Cleaning up my four-legged friend’s fur is sometimes easy, sometimes tricky, depending on where she sheds.
On tiles, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow, has no problem gobbling up any fluff in its way. It’s on these hard floors that it gets to flex the latest roller mop technology, maintaining a nice level of cleanliness.
But on carpets with thick fibres that act as a magnet for hair and fur, Roborock’s robot isn’t as impressive. It’s still a good robot vacuum cleaner: you just might have to give it a helping hand along the way.
With quite the mouthful of a name, you might find it tricky to determine where this model sits in the overall range. At its full price of $2,499, the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is one of Roborock’s more premium-level robotic appliances. If the price tag wasn’t a giveaway, the next identifier is its roller mop technology.
In recent years, higher-end robot vacuums have moved away from the spinning mop pads in favour of a roller design. The idea behind this design tweak is to exert more downward force and clean up more messes. In reality, most robots — the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow included — still can’t scrub away super crusted-on spills and greasy stains. There’s only so much power the low-profile form factor can apply, after all.
Roller mops are growing in popularity. Image: Chris Button.
Ironically, the $2,999 Roborock Saros 10 — one of the best robot vacuums of 2025 — would be considered the next step up from the Qrevo, yet it uses a mop pad, instead of the newer roller technology. However, the Saros 10 does have slightly more powerful suction power (22,00Pa), and a larger battery.
Spend a bit less on the $1,799 Qrevo C Pro, and you return to the spinning mop pads, and less suction power (18,500Pa). Looking at similarly priced competitors, the previous-gen Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni is reasonably close in specs, while the Dreame Aqua10 Roller also has a roller mop, albeit with a higher 30,000Pa claimed suction power.
In terms of cleaning and navigation technology, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow provides a similar set of features compared to other robots in the same price bracket.
Design
This is quite the cute robot cleaner, and it starts with the included docking station. Rather than the tall and boxy shape of most docks, this one is petite and rounded. With a glossy white finish, it looks like a little igloo for the robot to live in, which I find charming.
Compared to some docking stations I’ve installed in the past, the Qrevo 2 Flow’s station is even simpler. Built into the dock is a small ramp, leading to a small alcove the robot neatly nestles into in between cleaning runs. On top is a lid that opens easily, revealing clean and dirty water tanks, plus the dust bag compartment the robot empties its dry waste.
Images: Chris Button.
Roborock gets my approval for the dock’s relatively ergonomic design. Every compartment is easily accessible, and the water tanks have large carry handles to make removal, refilling, and reattaching simple. There are no awkward latches or pressure needed to open the lid; a small recess under the lid means you can open it single-handedly without much force.
As for the robot, it doesn’t depart from classic conventions. Matching the dock’s glossy white finish, it shows up dust and debris that accumulates over time, which serves as a reminder to wipe it over semi-regularly. At least it doesn’t show fingerprints and scuff marks like many darker appliances.
Image: Chris Button.
Two spinning brushes adorn the side, helping the robot direct dry messes into its path. They’re an important part of the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow because of the robot’s circular shape. Robot manufacturers dabbled with some square-shaped appliances in recent years, but it seems that round robots are here to stay. So, the side brushes help clean tight corners, while the mop roller also extends outward to get as close to walls as possible.
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow specifications and price
Vacuum suction power
20,000Pa
Mop type
Self-cleaning adaptive roller mop
Battery capacity
5,200mAh
Size
Robot: 353 x 353 x 119mm
Dock: 450 x 450 x 450mm
Dock features
75°C mop cleaning
55°C air drying
Auto-empty dustbin
From my experience, Roborock’s robot cleaners tend to be the fastest to set up and navigate homes more smartly than most. That view was challenged by the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow, which got a bit hungry for small objects the first couple of times I used it.
Near the front door is a water dish for our beloved cat, Billie. The dish sits on a silicon mat, so it doesn’t slip around when it’s drinking time. However, because of its low height, it’s one of the trickiest obstacles for any robot vacuum to detect.
Once again, that proved to be the case. On the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow’s first run, I returned home from a shopping trip to find the mat disturbed and the water dish upturned, water splashed everywhere. I’m pretty used to this by now — I should’ve remembered to move the drinking station off the floor and added a no-go zone via the Roborock app afterwards.
As long as you keep small obstacles out of the way, you shouldn’t have a problem. Image: Chris Button.
Except that the robot ignored much of the no-go zone on the next run, making another watery mess. $2,000 can’t get you a robot that avoids a pet’s water dish, it would seem. My theory is that the dish and mat sit below the robot sensors’ line of sight, so it tries to treat them as a threshold to be climbed over
Billie loves leaving her toys in random places throughout the house. Try as I might to keep them off the floor, feline friends have a way of defying decluttering efforts.
Some of these toys are small plush mice with short strings as tails. I thought the size of the mice would be large enough for the robot to detect and avoid.
I was wrong.
Midway through one of the robot’s first cleaning runs, a notification alerted me that a foreign object got stuck in the vacuum. I found the robot under the kitchen table, but it wasn’t immediately obvious what was wrong. Upon turning it upside down, I saw that it tried to inhale one of Billie’s toys. The toy’s string had been completely devoured, and the body of the mouse was trapped halfway through the robot’s suction port.
Thankfully, it was easy to yank the toy free and set the robot back on its path. Larger cables didn’t present an issue; they remain untouched, and the app correctly identified a power board, knowing to avoid it on future cleans.
The larger cables under my desk showed up in the Roborock app as obstacles. Screenshot: Chris Button.
Early misdemeanours aside, the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow avoids larger obstacles easily. It doesn’t collide with much, slowly coming to a stop and redirecting before bumping into walls and furniture. Just make sure you keep the small stuff off the floor.
Vacuuming and carpet performance
As I’ve mentioned in past robot vacuum reviews, the carpet in my house is notoriously tricky to clean. It has plenty of loop fibres that hair, fluff, and particles can’t help but get stuck in. A lot of vacuums struggle to dislodge particles from the forest that is my home’s carpet.
On tiles, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow has no problem picking up fur, fibres, and fluff. I’ll get to that in more detail in the next section. On carpet, the Qrevo proves itself to be more of a hard floor specialist.
After cleaning the carpets, the floor does look visibly cleaner. The robot picks up little bits of dirt, skin flakes, and other visible particles. It doesn’t quite get rid of cat fur, which sticks out like a sore thumb, trapped within the carpets’ fibres.
From left to right: before vacuuming, after the first vacuuming run, and the follow-up vacuum using the max settings.
As if to help me test out the robot, my cat went on a zoomies run, almost a day after I’d used the Dyson Big Ball to do a deep clean of the carpet. She left tufts of fur in her wake, keen to prove herself as the ultimate lab assistant.
After one cleaning run, the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow picked up some of the fur, but not all. Setting the robot to its maximum suction power and a deep cleaning route — which does a lattice pattern to comprehensively cover more ground — picked up most of the fur, but left some small fibres behind.
You can still spy some signs of my cat’s warpath if you look closely, but the robot did much better compared to the first attempt. But even though the Curv 2 Flow automatically adjusts suction power when it detects carpet, I still needed to manually change the settings to get the best results.
Fortunately, not once did the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow get tangled. A combination of cat fur and my partner’s long hair wasn’t enough to trip it up, so the anti-tangle technology passed the test.
Tiles and mopping performance
On tiles, the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is great. It comprehensively cleans up dirt, dust, cat fur, and even slightly bigger particles like bits of cat litter tracked throughout the house.
A big part of this robot’s vacuuming prowess stems from its dual spinning brushes. Some cheaper models have over-exuberant side brushes that flick fluff and debris out of the robot’s reach. Frustratingly, even when something is right in front of them, there’s a chance the mess will get flung across the room.
With the Qrevo Curv Flow 2, the brushes don’t rotate at full speed all the time. Instead, they intelligently adjust speed as needed. As a result, the brushes gently caress clumps of dust into its gaping maw, readily accepting the dirty snack.
It doesn’t take long for our household to accumulate patches of fur and fluff — our cat sees to that quite prolifically. So, after a few days in between cleans, there’s a clearly observable difference after the robot finishes a run. The tiles look and feel pleasantly clean.
Even the robot’s mop makes a nice difference, mainly as a form of regular maintenance. Despite the stronger roller mop design, it’s not powerful enough to dislodge anything too deeply stuck on the tiles.
To simulate some stickier messes, I spread some margarine and Nutella on the floor, along with a sprinkling of flour. As expected, the robot cleaned up the thinner margarine spread on the first attempt, while devouring the flour in a single pass.
Lighter substances, like flour and margarine stood no chance. Thicker spreads, like Nutella, took multiple attempts.
But the brown stuff is where it came undone. To be clear, every robot vacuum I’ve tested has not been able to clean up thicker spreads, like Vegemite or Nutella, without some assistance. This proved to be the case again with the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow, which gently smeared the hazelnut spread instead of cleaning it up.
After three attempts at removing the Nutella, a smidge still remained. I wiped it up with some damp paper towel, applying more pressure than any robot vacuum on the market can.
A point in favour of Roborock was its self-cleaning technology. Despite not cleaning up the Nutella, the robot didn’t spread it throughout the house. After the robot returned to the dock and completed its hot water self-cleaning cycle, I couldn’t spy any visible residue on the roller mop.
Who is the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow for?
Best suited to homes with hard floors or low pile carpets, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow continues robot manufacturers’ forays into roller mop technology. It’s a decent all-rounder but struggles to fully clean pet fur from denser carpets.
The cute, compact, and ergonomic docking station is a highlight, reducing hands-on maintenance. Roborock also shows its edge-cleaning prowess with the Curv 2 Flow; the extendable mop roller and adustable speed side brushes get into tight spots as well as any robotic appliance.
Some patience is required early on, with thin cables and pet toys proving difficult to detect. In a relatively non-cluttered home without thick carpets, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is a nifty hands-free cleaner.
GadgetGuy occasionally uses affiliate links and may receive a small commission from purchased products.
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow
Made for hard floor cleaning, the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is a decent all-rounder that sometimes needs a bit of help vacuuming carpets.
Features
8.5
Value for money
7
Performance
7.5
Ease of use
8
Design
8.5
Positives
Good hard floor cleaning performance
Anti-tangle technology holds up to cat fur and long hair
Adept at cleaning edges
Negatives
Struggles to vacuum fluff and dust stuck in thick carpet fibres
Sometimes can’t detect small objects like thin cables and pet toys
